🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.