🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to remove African American heritage and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be comforted with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.